2007 CEAL Conference
Committee on Japanese Materials
(CJM)
MINUTES
The 2007 annual meeting of the Committee on
Japanese Materials (CJM) was called to order at
1. Greeting, update and report
Ms. Keiko
Yokota-Carter, Chair of the CJM, welcomed the participants and introduced (1)
the members of the committee; (2) retired members; (3) new members during the
last twelve months; and presented an update of the CJM activities as described
below.
(1) CJM members
(2) Retired and new
members
(4) New members
(4)
Report from Chair
Ms. Yokoto-Carter reported on an ad-hoc meeting on Japanese digital
resources in the US which took place at the University of Tokyo on September 1,
2006, and which was co-sponsored by the Japan Association of National
University Libraries (JANUL), the
North American Coordinating Council on Japanese Library Resources (NCC) and CJM. At that meeting, issues
related to the subscription of digital products and databases by the North
American academic institutions were discussed with representatives from the
three major Japanese newspaper companies, Asahi, Nikkei and Yomiuri Shinbun.
Later, Ms. Yokota-Carter added that a detailed report on this Tōdai ad-hoc meeting would be presented
at the 2007 open meeting of the North American Coordinating Council on Japanese
Library Resources on March 24, 2007 at Tsai Auditorium of Harvard Center for
Government and International Studies.
At the present meeting, Ms. Yokota-Carter introduced representatives from
Japanese newspaper companies, Ms. Aoki from Asahi Shinbun, Mr. Nishimura and
Ms. Mori from Nikkei America. It was also mentioned that the Tōdai ad-hoc
meeting was a result of Mr. Sasakawa’s effort to assist and work with the North
American libraries and librarians to improve their access to Japanese
electronic resources.
2. Report from Europe
Mr. Antony Boussemart (Ecole française d’Extrême Orient) reported on the activities of the community of Japanese
librarians in Europe over the past twelve months:
Mr. Boussemart
introduced the PERSEE website at www.persee.fr, which is the website for scientific journals in social
and human sciences, established by the Ministry of State Education, Higher
Education and Research, the French government, and which includes 15 journals
that may contain articles related to Japanese studies. Another 32 journals will
be added in the near future.
3. Q&A on LC Japanese books outsourcing
project
Mr. Hideyuki Morimoto
(Columbia University) presented questions from CJM members regarding a
cataloging outsourcing pilot project at the Library of Congress that were
collected prior to the CJM meeting.
Mr. Philip A Meltzer
(Library of Congress, henceforth, LC) responded to those questions which had
been sent to him prior to the meeting, by providing a background, brief
description, and outcome of the pilot project as in the following.
(1) Background
Among the eight
Japanese catalogers and the Acting Team Leader on the Japanese Cataloging Team
for monograph cataloging, six are eligible to retire. The team received and
cataloged approximately 5,000 monographic titles over one year. It is unlikely
that those positions will be filled once they are vacated. As a result, LC
could find itself without sufficient staff to process incoming Japanese material.
However, there might be a solution to save cost for LC in processing Japanese
material. Indeed, the acquisitions and cataloging staff proposed that the
Library conduct an experiment to see whether a Japanese vendor could supply
shelf-ready material that met the Library’s selection and cataloging
requirements. For example, Casalini, an Italian book vendor for LC,
collaborated on a pilot project the objective of which was to provide
shelf-ready material for the LC Italian acquisitions in 2004. Mr. Isamu
Tsuchitani, Japanese Team Leader (retired) formed a working group including
selection officers, acquisition and cataloging staff members, to pursue this
pilot project. The group originally contacted two primary vendors of LC in
Japan, 1) Japan Publications Trading Company (JPTC) and 2) the Kinokuniya
Company. Kinokuniya expressed interest in working with the Library, so the
group negotiated the terms of the pilot project with Kinokuniya.
(2) Agreement
The Library and
Kinokuniya made an agreement in May 2006 that Kinokuniya would supply LC with
250 titles according to LC’s selection guidelines, with original (not copy)
core level cataloging records for those titles.
(3) Selection
Kinokuniya was to
select material of research value, 100 titles in the humanities, 100 in social
sciences (excluding law), and 50 in science and technology, following the
highly detailed General Approval Plan Selection Guidelines. Multipart
monographs and serials were to be excluded. Kinokuniya made efforts to avoid
duplication in the selection of monographs.
(4) Cataloging
Below is a description
of the technical characteristics of the pilot project:
(5) Receipt of material and feedback
Pilot project material was sent in four large shipments, and arrived at
LC between mid-May and the end of June, 2006. LC staff wished to thoroughly ascertain the quality of Kinokuniya’s
cataloging, and provide Kinokuniya with as complete a report on their
cataloging as possible. Every
record was scrutinized carefully, and highly detailed feedback was sent to
Kinokuniya.
(6) Workflow
There was a
several-month delay in having the records loaded into RLIN; therefore, each
Cutter number had to be checked in LC’s ILS to make sure that it had not been
used for another item in the interim. A certain amount of processing still had
to be done at LC. LC staff had to perform copy cataloging on all of the records
after they had been loaded into RLIN. They had to perform authority control and
end-stage processing on LC’s ILS.
(7)
Results
For the most part, Kinokuniya selected material according to LC’s
selection guidelines. It should be noted that it usually takes several years to
learn how to select material for LC. Kinokuniya has made a good beginning. Reviewers were favorably impressed by the
overall quality of Kinokuniya’s cataloging, considering that they had just
begun to catalog. Particularly
noteworthy was the high quality of descriptive cataloging and word division,
and the almost complete absence of typographical errors. A good start was also made on subject cataloging. Acquisitions staff had to handle pilot
project material only once, dramatically reducing and streamlining processing
time in that unit. Both Kinokuniya and LC staff approached the project
as the beginning of a long-term relationship. LC met with Kinokuniya representatives several times and
communicated with Kinokuniya staff via email while the project was being
planned, and during the project itself.
LC felt that the parties have made a generally good beginning, and that
the future business relationship could be improved with some adjustments on
both sides.
(8) Consideration
The Library is working
under a continuing resolution for Fiscal Year 2007. Thus, LC receives exactly
the same budget as last year. It means a slight decrease in its budget. LC only
received the budget in late January. It resulted that LC has not been able to
make plans for Fiscal Year 2007. LC anticipates very lean budgets for the
foreseeable future, and it is likely that staff members who retire may not be
replaced. Please note that provision of bibliographic data by vendors has not
resulted in loss of work for any LC staff member, nor are any plans afoot for
this to happen. On the contrary, bibliographic data supplied by vendors helps
free up LC staff to keep current with their acquisitions and cataloging duties.
Even with the receipt of vendor records, LC staff members have more than enough
work to keep them busy.
4. University of Michigan’s Google project on
Japanese books
Mr. Kenji Niki (University of Michigan) made a presentation on the
Google project on Japanese books at the University of Michigan including
showing how the digitized collection and books can be searched in Mirlyn, the
University of Michigan’s online catalog.
Google and University
of Michigan began the scanning of library collections in December 2005 starting
with older materials housed in the Annex Library. Data statistics to report the
progress has been released every two weeks. Scanning of Japanese materials in
the Annex Library will be completed in April/May 2007. Information of the
actual scanning and processing site has not been disclosed.
Mr. Niki concluded by
addressing the two critical issues and challenges in creating a digital
collection from their entire Japanese printed material collection: 1) the issue
that some of the material still fall within the copyright protection period and
2) the difficulties of performing Optical
character recognition, OCR, to digitize Japanese full texts.
5. Japan Center for Asian Historical Records (JACAR) Database
Mr. Shouhei Muta (Japan Center for Asian Historical Records, The National Archives of Japan) made a presentation of
the JACAR database [http://www.jacar.go.jp/index.html],
a digital database of Japan’s historical archive of official documents of the
Japanese government including the Cabinet, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and
the Army and the Navy, dating from the Meiji period to 1945. Mr. Muta outlined
the mission of the Center and the database. “Anytime, anywhere, anyone and
free” -- Mission of the JACAR is to provide access to historical documents to
the general public, anytime, from anywhere, and for free. JACAR does not just follow the traditional archiving
practice but also integrate and take advantage of the Internet technology to
provide access to historical official documents of the pre-war Japanese
government.
Mr. Muta demonstrated
the search functions of JACAR including index search, keyword search, layered
search, and cross file search in JACAR, National Archives of Japan and other
archives.
6. Youth,
war, and social change: teaching Japan through popular music
Professor Ian Condry (MIT) discussed his course, teaching Japan through
popular music, and including issues that librarians are concerned with,
including copyright, licensing related to Japanese pop music collection in an
academic library. Topics were:
Professor Condry then briefly outlined his course, the Japanese cultural
history through popular music from the post-war recovery period to current. He
also described how the MIT Lewis Music Library provided assistance to his
course by loaning the students iPods that had been loaded with an extensive
collection of Japanese popular music. Over a one and half year period, the
iPods were loaned to students ninety times, and it was considered“a great success.”
7. Questions and
Answers
Following reports and presentations, there were a few questions from
attendees for Mr. Niki regarding the Google project.
Q. Does the Google project include the U.S.
government publications?
A. Yes. Google has been scanning the government
publications.
Q. How is the quality assurance of digital
files done?
A. Google does not spend time to check
duplicates. Material in not-so-good conditions is not scanned. I do not have
information on how missing pages are checked, and whether even spot-checks are
conducted.
Q. What kind of material in the Japanese
Collection has been selected for scanning? Are there any criteria?
A. Scanning of 8,600 titles has been done. One
criterion is to scan titles that are older than fifty years, which is the
copyright protection duration in Japan.
The meeting
concluded at 10:20 a.m.
(Recorded by Eiichi Ito.)
2007 CEAL Conference
Committee on Japanese Materials
(CJM)
MINUTES
The 2007 annual meeting of the Committee on
Japanese Materials (CJM) was called to order at
1. Greeting, update and report
Ms. Keiko
Yokota-Carter, Chair of the CJM, welcomed the participants and introduced (1)
the members of the committee; (2) retired members; (3) new members during the
last twelve months; and presented an update of the CJM activities as described
below.
(1) CJM members
(2) Retired and new
members
(4) New members
(4)
Report from Chair
Ms. Yokoto-Carter reported on an ad-hoc meeting on Japanese digital
resources in the US which took place at the University of Tokyo on September 1,
2006, and which was co-sponsored by the Japan Association of National
University Libraries (JANUL), the
North American Coordinating Council on Japanese Library Resources (NCC) and CJM. At that meeting, issues
related to the subscription of digital products and databases by the North
American academic institutions were discussed with representatives from the
three major Japanese newspaper companies, Asahi, Nikkei and Yomiuri Shinbun.
Later, Ms. Yokota-Carter added that a detailed report on this Tōdai ad-hoc meeting would be presented
at the 2007 open meeting of the North American Coordinating Council on Japanese
Library Resources on March 24, 2007 at Tsai Auditorium of Harvard Center for
Government and International Studies.
At the present meeting, Ms. Yokota-Carter introduced representatives from
Japanese newspaper companies, Ms. Aoki from Asahi Shinbun, Mr. Nishimura and
Ms. Mori from Nikkei America. It was also mentioned that the Tōdai ad-hoc
meeting was a result of Mr. Sasakawa’s effort to assist and work with the North
American libraries and librarians to improve their access to Japanese
electronic resources.
2. Report from Europe
Mr. Antony Boussemart (Ecole française d’Extrême Orient) reported on the activities of the community of Japanese
librarians in Europe over the past twelve months:
Mr. Boussemart
introduced the PERSEE website at www.persee.fr, which is the website for scientific journals in social
and human sciences, established by the Ministry of State Education, Higher
Education and Research, the French government, and which includes 15 journals
that may contain articles related to Japanese studies. Another 32 journals will
be added in the near future.
3. Q&A on LC Japanese books outsourcing
project
Mr. Hideyuki Morimoto
(Columbia University) presented questions from CJM members regarding a
cataloging outsourcing pilot project at the Library of Congress that were
collected prior to the CJM meeting.
Mr. Philip A Meltzer
(Library of Congress, henceforth, LC) responded to those questions which had
been sent to him prior to the meeting, by providing a background, brief
description, and outcome of the pilot project as in the following.
(1) Background
Among the eight
Japanese catalogers and the Acting Team Leader on the Japanese Cataloging Team
for monograph cataloging, six are eligible to retire. The team received and
cataloged approximately 5,000 monographic titles over one year. It is unlikely
that those positions will be filled once they are vacated. As a result, LC
could find itself without sufficient staff to process incoming Japanese material.
However, there might be a solution to save cost for LC in processing Japanese
material. Indeed, the acquisitions and cataloging staff proposed that the
Library conduct an experiment to see whether a Japanese vendor could supply
shelf-ready material that met the Library’s selection and cataloging
requirements. For example, Casalini, an Italian book vendor for LC,
collaborated on a pilot project the objective of which was to provide
shelf-ready material for the LC Italian acquisitions in 2004. Mr. Isamu
Tsuchitani, Japanese Team Leader (retired) formed a working group including
selection officers, acquisition and cataloging staff members, to pursue this
pilot project. The group originally contacted two primary vendors of LC in
Japan, 1) Japan Publications Trading Company (JPTC) and 2) the Kinokuniya
Company. Kinokuniya expressed interest in working with the Library, so the
group negotiated the terms of the pilot project with Kinokuniya.
(2) Agreement
The Library and
Kinokuniya made an agreement in May 2006 that Kinokuniya would supply LC with
250 titles according to LC’s selection guidelines, with original (not copy)
core level cataloging records for those titles.
(3) Selection
Kinokuniya was to
select material of research value, 100 titles in the humanities, 100 in social
sciences (excluding law), and 50 in science and technology, following the
highly detailed General Approval Plan Selection Guidelines. Multipart
monographs and serials were to be excluded. Kinokuniya made efforts to avoid
duplication in the selection of monographs.
(4) Cataloging
Below is a description
of the technical characteristics of the pilot project:
(5) Receipt of material and feedback
Pilot project material was sent in four large shipments, and arrived at
LC between mid-May and the end of June, 2006. LC staff wished to thoroughly ascertain the quality of Kinokuniya’s
cataloging, and provide Kinokuniya with as complete a report on their
cataloging as possible. Every
record was scrutinized carefully, and highly detailed feedback was sent to
Kinokuniya.
(6) Workflow
There was a
several-month delay in having the records loaded into RLIN; therefore, each
Cutter number had to be checked in LC’s ILS to make sure that it had not been
used for another item in the interim. A certain amount of processing still had
to be done at LC. LC staff had to perform copy cataloging on all of the records
after they had been loaded into RLIN. They had to perform authority control and
end-stage processing on LC’s ILS.
(7)
Results
For the most part, Kinokuniya selected material according to LC’s
selection guidelines. It should be noted that it usually takes several years to
learn how to select material for LC. Kinokuniya has made a good beginning. Reviewers were favorably impressed by the
overall quality of Kinokuniya’s cataloging, considering that they had just
begun to catalog. Particularly
noteworthy was the high quality of descriptive cataloging and word division,
and the almost complete absence of typographical errors. A good start was also made on subject cataloging. Acquisitions staff had to handle pilot
project material only once, dramatically reducing and streamlining processing
time in that unit. Both Kinokuniya and LC staff approached the project
as the beginning of a long-term relationship. LC met with Kinokuniya representatives several times and
communicated with Kinokuniya staff via email while the project was being
planned, and during the project itself.
LC felt that the parties have made a generally good beginning, and that
the future business relationship could be improved with some adjustments on
both sides.
(8) Consideration
The Library is working
under a continuing resolution for Fiscal Year 2007. Thus, LC receives exactly
the same budget as last year. It means a slight decrease in its budget. LC only
received the budget in late January. It resulted that LC has not been able to
make plans for Fiscal Year 2007. LC anticipates very lean budgets for the
foreseeable future, and it is likely that staff members who retire may not be
replaced. Please note that provision of bibliographic data by vendors has not
resulted in loss of work for any LC staff member, nor are any plans afoot for
this to happen. On the contrary, bibliographic data supplied by vendors helps
free up LC staff to keep current with their acquisitions and cataloging duties.
Even with the receipt of vendor records, LC staff members have more than enough
work to keep them busy.
4. University of Michigan’s Google project on
Japanese books
Mr. Kenji Niki (University of Michigan) made a presentation on the
Google project on Japanese books at the University of Michigan including
showing how the digitized collection and books can be searched in Mirlyn, the
University of Michigan’s online catalog.
Google and University
of Michigan began the scanning of library collections in December 2005 starting
with older materials housed in the Annex Library. Data statistics to report the
progress has been released every two weeks. Scanning of Japanese materials in
the Annex Library will be completed in April/May 2007. Information of the
actual scanning and processing site has not been disclosed.
Mr. Niki concluded by
addressing the two critical issues and challenges in creating a digital
collection from their entire Japanese printed material collection: 1) the issue
that some of the material still fall within the copyright protection period and
2) the difficulties of performing Optical
character recognition, OCR, to digitize Japanese full texts.
5. Japan Center for Asian Historical Records (JACAR) Database
Mr. Shouhei Muta (Japan Center for Asian Historical Records, The National Archives of Japan) made a presentation of
the JACAR database [http://www.jacar.go.jp/index.html],
a digital database of Japan’s historical archive of official documents of the
Japanese government including the Cabinet, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and
the Army and the Navy, dating from the Meiji period to 1945. Mr. Muta outlined
the mission of the Center and the database. “Anytime, anywhere, anyone and
free” -- Mission of the JACAR is to provide access to historical documents to
the general public, anytime, from anywhere, and for free. JACAR does not just follow the traditional archiving
practice but also integrate and take advantage of the Internet technology to
provide access to historical official documents of the pre-war Japanese
government.
Mr. Muta demonstrated
the search functions of JACAR including index search, keyword search, layered
search, and cross file search in JACAR, National Archives of Japan and other
archives.
6. Youth,
war, and social change: teaching Japan through popular music
Professor Ian Condry (MIT) discussed his course, teaching Japan through
popular music, and including issues that librarians are concerned with,
including copyright, licensing related to Japanese pop music collection in an
academic library. Topics were:
Professor Condry then briefly outlined his course, the Japanese cultural
history through popular music from the post-war recovery period to current. He
also described how the MIT Lewis Music Library provided assistance to his
course by loaning the students iPods that had been loaded with an extensive
collection of Japanese popular music. Over a one and half year period, the
iPods were loaned to students ninety times, and it was considered“a great success.”
7. Questions and
Answers
Following reports and presentations, there were a few questions from
attendees for Mr. Niki regarding the Google project.
Q. Does the Google project include the U.S.
government publications?
A. Yes. Google has been scanning the government
publications.
Q. How is the quality assurance of digital
files done?
A. Google does not spend time to check
duplicates. Material in not-so-good conditions is not scanned. I do not have
information on how missing pages are checked, and whether even spot-checks are
conducted.
Q. What kind of material in the Japanese
Collection has been selected for scanning? Are there any criteria?
A. Scanning of 8,600 titles has been done. One
criterion is to scan titles that are older than fifty years, which is the
copyright protection duration in Japan.
The meeting
concluded at 10:20 a.m.
(Recorded by Eiichi Ito.)